PAGE NEEDS UPDATE AFTER QUARTERLY PLANNING DISCUSSION
Jira Updates:
Review Jira Workflow Issues/Suggestions → are there any other action items we need to follow-up on?
Review Super Nurse Practices and Protocols for Jira requirements
Moved Backlog Status, E-Com UX Status (when applicable), Story Points & Epic Link to the top of the tickets for easy review and visibility
Labels moved to the hidden section in the bottom right section
Statuses Requirements:
Status is “Backlog” by default
E-Com UX Status should be “Not Started” by default (we can work on updating that)
Backlog Status should be “To Be Refined” by default (we can work on updating that)
Backlog Status should remain in “To Be Refined” until E-Com UX Status is “Complete”
Ticket Requirements need to be filled out before it’s “Ready for Development”
Description & Acceptance Criteria need to include all requirements
We have Figma mocks when applicable
Once the ticket has been refined, Backlog Status should be moved to “Ready”, Story Points are filled out, then update Status
Tickets need to be pulled into the current Sprint before the Status moves to “In Development”
Ticket Requirements need to be filled out before it’s “Ready for Testing”
Testing Plan & Testing Instructions need to be filled out by the Developer before QA starts testing
Developers need to test their approved code locally to confirm it works
Other standard Requirements:
Product Team is required for tickets to show on our Sprint & Kanban boards
Don’t forget to fill out Developer, Tester & UX Designer (Bug tickets require Bug Source instead)
Process Updates:
[UPDATE] Scrum of Scrums w/Leadership team & Sr. Devs/Epic Owners
Review https://relias.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/ATLAS documentation
What are we trying to accomplish and how does Atlas help?
Improved visibility with the ability to self-serve the information you need (both for teams and stakeholders)
Establishing a source of truth for the latest progress and updates
Keeping stakeholders informed while reducing time spent in meetings
Easy insight into each team’s OKRs and establishing OKR best practices across all teams and leadership
Visibly connecting team OKRs to high level business goals
What are goals and projects?
Who are followers?
Everyone on our teams should be following our goals & projects to ensure everyone sees the weekly updates & sees what’s being shared with our stakeholders - automated emails come out every Monday morning
If you see issues with the information provided, please reach out - we want to make sure everyone is aligned with the current status of the project, dependencies, blockers, etc.
Who provides updates and how are those determined?
We will go through the Fist to Five Voting exercise as a group (screenshot below) - this will gauge the teams' confidence level in our current expected delivery date
The leadership team discusses this feedback and crafts the updates that Delivery Management adds to Atlas each week
On Track: while there is always a little risk, the most likely scenario is delivering value by the target date.
The team is confident in the target date and reporting all 4s and 5s when doing fist to five confidence checks.
No support needed from stakeholders.
At Risk: its still possible to hit the target date, but its more likely that we won’t.
The team is losing confidence in the target date and reporting 3s and 4s when doing fist to five confidence checks.
Updates need to include support needed from stakeholders, the team’s next steps, and rationale on why the project is At Risk.
Off Track: very little to no chance of delivering value on the target date.
The team does not have confidence (reporting 0s, 1s, and 2s when doing fist to five confidence checks) and will be re-planning. We need a new approach, reduced scope, or adjusted delivery timing.
Updates need to include the team’s next steps in re-planning as well as any stakeholder support needed.
Have questions? Reach out in the atlas-answers Slack channel or to me directly
Reference for past info:
Q2 2023 Quarterly Planning Topics